🏪 Window Shop — Epic Health Report

Well-structured epic with clear problem framing, specific scope boundaries, quantified success metrics, and two detailed user stories. One open question (product grouping criteria) listed with DS as owner but unresolved. Figma property not populated despite Design in team — Design Task Tracker links exist but no direct Figma URL — which blocks QA from verifying UI correctness. Release Notes absent (not a review blocker). Linear epic AGI-2737 set with 12 children (VTO frame, BE-controlled feed, cross-session dedup, filter wiring) aligning with scope.

Well-structured, substantive epic. Two specific feed gaps named, three outcome goals, three quantified metrics, three detailed scope items, five explicit exclusions, five rich user stories. Two open questions (frame count threshold, memory vs micro-signal balance) assigned to DS but unresolved. Team is DS + Eng: Products — no Design/FE so Figma is N/A (✅). Linear Epic property is empty — blocks review tag. Critical note: scope irregularity section (2026-05-29) notes child tickets AGI-3549–3553 are over-scoped vs v1 engineering design doc; QA must test against v1 scope only.

Strong, well-structured epic. Clear problem, three outcome goals, four specific scope items, four explicit exclusions, two user stories including fallback scenario. Success metrics has one qualitative metric with no quantified threshold. Two open questions (image selection criteria, low-confidence fallback) assigned to DS but unresolved. Team is DS + Eng: Products — no Design/FE so Figma is N/A (✅ pass). Linear Epic property is empty — blocks review tag despite otherwise strong content.

Among the best-documented epics. Four outcome goals, five quantified metrics, detailed capability table (P0/P1), eight explicit out-of-scope items, four user stories with copy examples, technical architecture diagram, full data model schema. Design team IS listed so Figma is required — no dedicated Figma file for this epic; UX discussion references an existing component pattern (⚠️). Q5 (modal vs inline UX) unresolved. Linear Epic property is empty — blocks review tag.

Well-documented DS epic with clear TL;DR, pack-set table, acceptance criteria, and out-of-scope. Goals implicit in feature descriptions. UX/Use Cases absent. Linear AGI-3245 has ~16 children covering all layers; 1 active (AGI-3654 In Progress). Figma N/A for DS-only.

Has a scope list (voice options, read-only fields) and an explicit out-of-scope section (3 items). Several scope items have unresolved inline discussions and vague 'maybe' items. No problem statement, goals, metrics, user stories, or release notes. Figma in Linear children (AGI-4067, AGI-4068) but not on the Notion page. Linear AGI-4015 is well-ticketed with 6 children covering navigation, voice setup, quick buttons, save flow, playback speed, welcome messages.

Solid structural bones: detailed approach, key decisions, comprehensive acceptance criteria, explicit Out of Scope. Problem implied in callout but no Problem heading. No Success Metrics or UX/Use Cases. Figma only via Design Tracker property. No Linear Epic.

The epic has a clear 'What and Why' problem statement and describes the design port scope (more states covered, added motion). Figma is referenced in Linear child AGI-4153 but not in the Notion property or page body. Goals, Success Metrics, Not in Scope, and UX/Use Cases are all absent. One open question (voice animation finalization) remains unresolved. Linear is well-aligned with 3 children (AAO UI uplift AGI-4153, voice volume AGI-4155, voice animation AGI-4156) matching scope.

Epic has a detailed Signal Taxonomy and widget description (Widget 4.3), plus an embedded mock design image. Standard PRD structure is heavily missing: Problem is three bullet questions (weak), Goal is a one-liner, no Success Metrics, no Not in Scope, Figma absent despite Design in team. Linear Epic property points to AGI-3202 which is the Phase 1 epic (Done) — all child issues are Phase 1 work. Phase 2 does not have its own Linear epic. Release Notes absent.

Lightweight scope list covering Live VTO and Still VTO enable/disable, products include/exclude, and 'complete the look' defaults. Two scope items flagged as unclear in inline discussions. No problem statement, goals, metrics, user stories, or release notes. Figma accessible via Linear children (AGI-4088, AGI-4090) but not surfaced in Notion property. Linear AGI-4014 set with 3 children (VTO Settings FE, VTO Settings BE, archived layout ticket).

This epic contains only a callout pointing to another Notion page — all PRD content lives in the referenced document. Design and FE teams listed so Figma is required; a Figma URL exists in Linear child AGI-4017 but not on this Notion page. Linear AGI-4016 set with 2 children (FE parent AGI-4017 with Figma link, BE parent AGI-4150). PRD content must be incorporated into this epic before QA can engage.

Substantive technical content in Context/Scope sections but no standard PRD structure. Problem well-understood internally (stale system prompts, retired tool names in prod). No Dev Owner, no Linear Epic property set.

Nearly empty epic. The Scope section lists only 'Discounts' and 'Shipping' with no detail. All other sections are blank. No problem statement, goals, metrics, user stories, or release notes. Design+FE team requires Figma but none is present. Linear Epic property is empty.

In QA with almost no written specification. Single vague scope bullet. Linear AGI-2516 Done with 4 children (pre-ingestion images, backfill, listener, test) all Done and aligned. No problem statement, goals, or acceptance criteria in Notion.

Minimal scope note rather than a full epic. Page body contains two bullet-point bug fixes and a Linear link in the body (not in the property field). No problem statement, goals, metrics, user stories, or release notes. Pure Eng: Core team so Figma N/A. PM and Dev owners populated. Linear property empty — body references AGI-3962 but property field is blank.

Brief scope list (3 bullets: agent language selection, admin dashboard Centra form, platform-agnostic store provision refactor) but no problem statement, goals, metrics, user stories, or release notes. Pure Eng: Core team so Figma N/A. PM and Dev owners populated. Linear property empty.

Lightweight scope list (localise US sizes, select translation, ingest related products, colour swatches, plus two bug fixes) with no supporting PRD content. No problem statement, goals, metrics, user stories, or release notes. Pure Eng: Core team so Figma N/A. PM and Dev owners populated. Linear property empty.

Placeholder page. Scope section contains only a one-paragraph proposal (create dedicated k8 cluster, route by swapId/custom domain — TBC) with no problem statement, goals, metrics, user stories, or release notes. Pure Eng: Core team so Figma N/A. PM and Dev owners populated. Linear Epic property empty; body has AGI-3504 link but property field is blank.

Critically underspecified despite being In QA. Partial scope via Explanation of Scope paragraph. Linear Epic property points to AGI-2730 (v0.1, Done, 5 children all Done); body references AGI-3722 for v0.2 — property needs updating.

In Development with one sentence describing finance issues but no specifics on which reports or requirements. Linear Epic property empty. Referenced Slack thread inaccessible inline.

This page has a Scope section with two bullet points (one referencing a self-link, one linking to a Linear parent ticket AGI-3588) and empty Linear Tickets and Related Resources sections. There is no problem statement, no goals, no metrics, no explicit scope boundary, no exclusions, no UX, no release notes, and no Linear Epic property set. DS and Dev Owners are assigned and PM is set. Essentially undocumented despite Prioritised status.

Placeholder epic with only a blank Scope section and empty Linear Tickets/Related Resources sections. No content criteria met. PM owner is populated but Dev Owner is empty (Design-only team, exploration stage). Figma is required (Design team listed) but absent. Linear property is empty. Needs foundational content before any review.

Empty sprint coordination page with three placeholder headings but no content. Linear Epic points to AGI-3153 (week 04/27, now Done with 7 children all Done) — stale reference for this week's epic.

Task-list catchall epic for the week of June 1–5 with 5 bullet points and no documentation. No problem, goals, metrics, scope, UX, Figma, release notes, or Linear. PM assigned but no Dev Owner.